Skip to main content

Order of tables appear in the SQL generated by the MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine


Order of tables appear in the SQL generated by the MicroStrategy



Most latest generation databases provide the same performance regardless of the order in which the tables are placed in the FROM clause SQL query. Their optimizers take care of choosing the most efficient way of performing the joins. Other databases perform differently producing a different order. This means that a database compiler may choose a different join path that can be more or less efficient.

By default, the MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine orders the tables in the following way:
  1. Fact Tables
  2. Metric Qualification (MQ) Tables
  3. Relationship Tables
  4. Lookup Tables

But this behavior can be changed by using the 'From Clause Order' VLDB property under the 'Joins' folder. This setting has four values:


Below are the values that the setting may have:
  • Normal FROM clause order as generated by the engine
    This is the default value. It uses the following order:

    1. Fact Tables
    2. MQ Tables
    3. Relationship Tables
    4. Lookup Tables


  • Move last table in normal FROM clause order to the first
    This option moves the last table in the normal order (which is a lookup table) to the beginning of the From clause. This value is useful in some Oracle databases where it may be more efficient for the Fact table not to be the first table in the From clause.

  • Move MQ table in normal FROM clause order to the last (for Redbrick)
    This value orders the MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine to place the MQ tables at the end of the FROM clause. So the order becomes the following:

    1. Fact Tables
    2. Relationship Tables
    3. Lookup Tables
    4. MQ Tables
  • Reverse FROM clause order as generated by the Engine
    This value reverses the normal order of tables as generated by the MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine. So the order becomes the following:

    1. Lookup Tables
    2. Relationship Tables
    3. MQ Tables
    4. Fact Tables
Note: The "From Clause Order" VLDB property is intended to control syntax only, not join behavior. Report results should be the same for all values of this setting. If the report uses only inner joins, then the only thing that changes is the table order. One-sided outer joins will switch direction when the From clause order is altered.

For example, a report that performs left outer joins to lookup tables (using the "Preserve all final pass result elements" VLDB property) will generate SQL such as the following:

select   a11.REGION_ID REGION_ID,
   max(a14.REGION_NAME) REGION_NAME,
   a12.CATEGORY_ID CATEGORY_ID,
   max(a13.CATEGORY_DESC) CATEGORY_DESC,
   sum(a11.TOT_DOLLAR_SALES) WJXBFS1
from   STATE_SUBCATEG_REGION_SLS   a11
   left outer join   LU_SUBCATEG   a12
    on    (a11.SUBCAT_ID = a12.SUBCAT_ID)
   left outer join   LU_CATEGORY   a13
    on    (a12.CATEGORY_ID = a13.CATEGORY_ID)

   left outer join   LU_REGION   a14
    on    (a11.REGION_ID = a14.REGION_ID)

group by   a11.REGION_ID,
   a12.CATEGORY_ID
    Moving the last table to the top of the From clause places the joins for the first three tables in parentheses. LU_REGION, formerly last, now appears first and right outer joins to the parenthesized join expression.

    select   a11.REGION_ID REGION_ID,
       max(a14.REGION_NAME) REGION_NAME,
       a12.CATEGORY_ID CATEGORY_ID,
       max(a13.CATEGORY_DESC) CATEGORY_DESC,
       sum(a11.TOT_DOLLAR_SALES) WJXBFS1
    from   LU_REGION   a14
       right outer join
       (STATE_SUBCATEG_REGION_SLS   a11
       left outer join   LU_SUBCATEG   a12
        on    (a11.SUBCAT_ID = a12.SUBCAT_ID)
       left outer join   LU_CATEGORY   a13
        on    (a12.CATEGORY_ID = a13.CATEGORY_ID))

        on    (a11.REGION_ID = a14.REGION_ID)
    group by   a11.REGION_ID,
       a12.CATEGORY_ID
      Both From clauses are functionally identical. This is by design -- the intent of this property is to change the From clause order only, to fit better with a particular database platform's SQL optimizer.

      If it is needed to change the behavior of outer joins, the VLDB properties pertaining to outer joins should be used:

      • Preserve all final pass result elements
      • Preserve all lookup table elements
      • Downward outer join


      Comments

      Popular posts from this blog

      Control the display of null and zero metric values

      Show   Control the display of null and zero metric values in a grid report You can determine how to display or hide rows and columns in a grid report that consist only of null or zero metric values. You can have MicroStrategy hide the rows and columns in the following ways: Hide rows and columns that consist only of null metric values Hide rows and columns that consist only of zero metric values Hide rows and columns that consist only of null or zero metric values (default) Once you have defined how MicroStrategy hides null and zero metric values in the grid, you can quickly show or hide the grid using the Hide Nulls/Zeros option in the Data menu, as described below, or by clicking the  Hide Nulls/Zeros  icon  in the Data toolbar. To determine how null and zero metric values are displayed or hidden in a grid report Open the report in Edit mode. From the  Tools  menu, select  Report Options . The Report Options dialog box opens. To determine how

      Prompt-in-prompt(Nested Prompts) in Microstrategy

      Prompt-in-prompt(Nested Prompts) in  Microstrategy Nested prompts allows you to create one prompt based on the other and other bases on another, nested prompts allows us to prompt the highest level(Like year) to middle level(like Quarter, then to the low level(like Month). Here you can see how to  create a 3-level deep nested prompt that will prompt the user to select a year, then a quarter within that year, then a month within that quarter. Prompt-in-prompt is a feature in which the answer to one prompt is used to define another prompt. This feature is only implemented for element list prompts . The following procedure describes how to achieve this: Create the highest level filter. This is a filter which contains a prompt on an attribute element list. Create a filter on the attribute "Year." Click "prompt on attribute element list" and click "Next" through the rest of the screens to accept the default values. Do not set any additio

      Types of filters in Microstrategy

      Types of filters in Microstrategy Below are the types of filters: 1. Attribute qualification filter These types of qualifications restrict data related to attributes on the report. a) Attribute form qualification Filters data related to a business attribute’s form(s), such as ID or description. •  For example, the attribute Customer has the forms ID, First Name, Last Name, Address, and Birth Date. An attribute form qualification might filter on the form Last Name, the operator Begins With, and the letter H. The results show a list of customers whose last names start with the letter H. b) Attribute element list qualification Filters data related to a business attribute’s elements, such as New York, Washington, and San Francisco, which are elements of the attribute City. • For example, the attribute Customer has the elements John Smith, Jane Doe, William Hill, and so on. An attribute element list qualification can filter data to display only those customers sp

      Metric values are repeated across rows when a report is executed in MicroStrategy

      Metric values are repeated across rows when a report is executed in MicroStrategy When comparing report results between DB Query Tool and MicroStrategy, some reports show repeated metric values in MicroStrategy where there were none in DB Query Tool. To illustrate the issue, a fact table CAT_ITEM_SLS has been added into the MicroStrategy Tutorial project and populated with a small set of three rows. CAT_ID ITEM_ID REVENUE  1 1  10   1 2  20  2  2  30  Report results in DB Query Tool: Report results in MicroStrategy: In MicroStrategy, the row for "Art As Experience" in the Spring 2007 catalog repeats the $20 value from the Winter 2007 catalog, where DB Query Tool shows the $30 value from the fact table. CAUSE The discrepancy occurs because the attribute elements for Catalog and Item are in a many-to-many relationship, but the attribute relationship in the MicroStrategy schema is defined incorrectly with a one-to-many relationship. Not

      Microstrategy Dossiers explained

      Microstrategy  Dossiers With the release of MicroStrategy 10.9, we’ve taken a leap forward in our dashboarding capabilities by simplifying the user experience, adding storytelling, and collaboration.MSTR has  evolved dashboards to the point that they are more than dashboards - they are  interactive, collaborative analytic stories . Ultimately, it was time to go beyond dashboards, both in concept and in name, and so  the've  renamed VI dashboards to  ‘ dossiers ’.  Dossiers can be created by using the new Desktop product or Workstation or simply from the Web interface which replaces Visual Insights. All the existing visual Insights dashboards will be converted to Dossiers   With MicroStrategy 10.9, there was an active focus on making it easier to build dashboards for the widest audience of end users. To achieve this, some key new capabilities were added that make it easier to author, read, interact and collaborate on dashboards without any formal training. In fact, the add

      Enabling the Quick Search feature for MicroStrategy Web

      Enable the quick search for MicroStrategy Web When exporting a report containing an image attribute form (using an ApplySimple statement) to PDF in MicroStrategy Web 9.4.1 and 10.x, with the Intelligence Server running on Linux, the image in the exported PDF report appears as a red "X" as shown below: However, the images in the report display properly when the report is executed in MicroStrategy Developer and Web. Furthermore, when the report is exported to PDF on Desktop (with the original images saved in WebASPX\Images), the images in the report display properly, as indicated below: CAUSE This is expected behavior. When the report is displayed in MicroStrategy Developer and Web, or when the report is exported to PDF from MicroStrategy Developer, images in the "WebASPX\Images" folder are used. However, when a report that contains images is exported to PDF from Web, the Intelligence Server will attempt to reference the location in the

      Microstrategy Caches explained

      Microstrategy Caches Improving Response Time: Caching A  cache is a result set that is stored on a system to improve response time in future requests.  With caching, users can retrieve results from Intelligence Server rather than re-executing queries against a database. To delete all object caches for a project 1 In Developer, log into a project. You must log in with a user account that has administrative privileges. 2 From the  Administration  menu, point to  Projects , and then select  Project Configuration . The Project Configuration Editor opens. 3 Expand  Caching , expand  Auxiliary Caches , then select  Objects . To delete all configuration object caches for a server 1 Log in to the project source. 2 From the  Administration  menu in Developer, point to  Server , and then select  Purge Server Object Caches . 4 Click  Purge Now . To purge web cache follow the steps in the link below: https://microstrategyanalytics.blogspot.com/2018/12/purge-we

      Case functions Microstrategy

      Ca se functions Microstrategy Case functions return specified data in a SQL query based on the evaluation of user-defined conditions. In general, a user specifies a list of conditions and corresponding return values. Case This function evaluates multiple expressions until a condition is determined to be true, then returns a corresponding value. If all conditions are false, a default value is returned.  Case  can be used for categorizing data based on multiple conditions. This is a single-value function. Syntax Case ( Condition1 ,  ReturnValue1 ,  Condition2 , ReturnValue2 ,...,  DefaultValue ) Example Case(([Total Revenue] < 300000), 0, ([Total Revenue] < 600000), 1, 2) sum(Case (Day@DESC in (“Sat”,”Sun”), Sales, 0) {~+} Sum(Case(Category@DESC In("Books","Electronics"),Revenue,0)){~+} CaseV (case vector) CaseV  evaluates a single metric and returns different values according to the results. It can be used to perform transf

      Microstrategy Document Editor Sections Important Notes:

      Microstrategy Document Editor Sections Important Notes: The Layout area is in the center of the Document Editor interface and provides the framework for precisely controlling where controls (such as text fields, grid and graph reports, images, and widgets) are displayed when the document is viewed in different display modes, printed, exported, emailed, and so on. To add data to the document, drag objects from the  Dataset Objects  panel and drop them into the  Layout  area. Controls are rendered differently depending on what section they are placed in, as described below:   Page Header : The control is displayed at the top of each page in the document. By default, if a document contains multiple layouts, the same Page Header is displayed for all layouts in the document. You can change this setting so that each layout has a separate Page Header. Document Header : The control is displayed once at the beginning of the document, immediately below the Page Header section. Any data fields pl
      Microstrategy Release Types Platform release Interval:  Annually every twelve (12) months in December Who:  Entire customer base What:  Focus on production level security, stability, and performance defect fixes for all customers. Expectation:  Customer has chosen platform path and wants product stability without new enhancements. Support:  Three (3) years, patches for approved P1 defects, and regular hotfix cadence addresses critical defects. Feature Release Interval:  Quarterly every three (3) months Who:  Customers with specific feature requirements. What:  New functionality developed in close collaboration with customers and customer council. Expectation:  Customer has chosen feature path, will consume further feature releases. Support:  Six (6) months patch support for approved P1 defects and (eighteen) 18 months troubleshooting. Customers upgrade to next feature release for roll-up fixes. Why has MicroStrategy introduced “Platform” and “Feature