Skip to main content

Star schemas and aggregate (or summary) fact tables


Aggregate tables can further improve query performance by reducing the number of rows over which higher-level metrics must be aggregated. 
However, the use of aggregate tables with dimension tables is not a valid physical modeling strategy. Whenever aggregation is performed over fact data, it is a general requirement that tables joined to the fact table must be at the same attribute level or at a higher level. If the auxiliary table is at a lower level, fact rows will be replicated prior to aggregation and this will result in inflated metric values (also known as "multiple counting").

With the above Time dimension table, a fact table at the level of Day functions correctly because there is exactly one row in DIM_TIME for each day. To aggregate the facts to the level of Quarter, it is valid to join the fact table to the dimension table and group by the quarter ID from the dimension table.

Sql
select DT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(DT.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from DAY_FACT_TABLE FT
   join DIM_TIME DT
      on (FT.DAY_ID = DT.DAY_ID)
group by DT.QUARTER_ID

If, however, there is an aggregate fact table already at the level of Quarter, the results will not be correct. This is because the query must join on Quarter ID, but the quarter ID is not a unique key of the dimension table. Because any given quarter of a year contains 90, 91 or 92 days, the dimension table will contain that many rows with the same quarter ID. Thus fact rows will be replicated prior to taking the sum, and the sum will be too high.

Sql
select FT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(DT.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from QTR_FACT_TABLE FT
   join DIM_TIME DT
      on (FT.QUARTER_ID = DT.QUARTER_ID)
group by FT.QUARTER_ID

This is a generally recognized problem with star schemas, and is not strictly a MicroStrategy limitation.

Star schemas will function correctly with MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.x as long as they obey the general data warehousing principle that fact tables should not be at a higher level than the dimension tables to which they are joined.

If aggregate tables are required, it is necessary to provide higher-level lookup tables with unique rows corresponding to each aggregate table's key. Logical views are a way to do this without adding tables or views to the warehouse. For example, LWV_LU_QUARTER may be defined using the following SQL statement:

Sql
select distinct QUARTER_ID, QUARTER_DESC, YEAR_ID
from DIM_TIME

 

With this logical view, it becomes possible for MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.x to query the quarter-level fact table as follows. Since the logical view has distinct rows per quarter, multiple counting will not occur in this query.

Sql
select FT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(LQ.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from QTR_FACT_TABLE FT
   join (select distinct QUARTER_ID, QUARTER_DESC, YEAR_ID
         from DIM_TIME) LQ
      on (FT.QUARTER_ID = LQ.QUARTER_ID)
group by FT.QUARTER_ID

For more information on the use of logical views in MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.1.x and 9.x, consult the MicroStrategy Project Design Guide manual, Appendix B: Logical Tables, "Creating logical tables."

Aggregate tables store pre-summarized totals at a higher level of aggregation than the most granular fact table. They allow reports to be generated from small, rather than large, tables; therefore, performance is enhanced. A successful aggregation strategy seeks to choose aggregate tables that will have the most impact while taking the least amount of space.

Aggregation decisions are driven by the following factors:

  • Usage patterns: Build aggregate tables that are likely to be used the most.
  • Compression ratios: The compression ratio between two tables is defined as the size of the aggregate compared to the size of the smallest table from which the aggregate can be derived.
  • Volatility: Changes in hierarchies over time impact the accuracy of aggregate tables. Sometimes aggregate tables must be rebuilt as a result of changes in dimensions.
A good candidate for aggregation should have at most 10-15 percent of the size of the smallest table from which it is derived.

EXAMPLE:
The MicroStrategy Tutorial project uses aggregate tables by default. A simple metric sum (Revenue) will go to different aggregate tables depending on the attributes on the template.

  1. Create a report with Year on the rows and Revenue on the columns.
  2. Execute the report and view the SQL:

  3. Drill from Year to Item and view the SQL:

The query will go from using ORDER_FACT to ORDER_DETAIL. When Year is on the template, the engine selects the smaller table and the fact is calculated as:

sum(a11.ORDER_AMT)
    instead of:

    sum((a11.QTY_SOLD * (a11.UNIT_PRICE - a11.DISCOUNT)))
    Labels:

    Comments

    1. hinaFebruary 5, 2021 at 12:19 PM

      Is there any solution now to use aggregate tables with star schema without creating logical tables?

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    Types of prompts in Microstrategy

    Types of prompts in Microstrategy The different types of prompts allow you to create a  prompt  for nearly every part of a report. Prompts can be used in many objects including reports, filters, metrics, and custom groups, but all prompts require user interaction when the report is executed. The correct prompt type to create depends on what report objects you want users to be able to base a filter on to filter data, as described in the list below. Filter definition prompts   allow users to determine how the report's data is filtered, based on one of the following objects: Attributes in a hierarchy : Users can select prompt answers from one or more attribute elements from one or more attributes. The attribute elements that they select are used to filter data displayed on the report. This prompt lets you give users the largest number of attribute elements to choose from when they answer the prompt to define their filtering criteria. For example, on a repor...
    1 comment
    Read more

    Microstrategy "Error type: Odbc error. Odbc operation attempted

     "Error type: Odbc error. Odbc operation attempted: SQLExecDirect. [HYT00:0: on SQLHANDLE] [MicroStrategy][ODBC Oracle Wire Protocol driver]Timeout expired" is shown when executing reports from Web When users are trying to execute some reports in MicroStrategy web in particular, they may receive the Error “SQL Generation Complete Index out of range” and “Timeout expired” error as shown below: Possible Causes: One possible cause is that the MicroStrategy Intelligence Server using a cached database connection that was already dropped by the RDBMS. To resolve this: Admin should delete the database connection caches and create a new DSNs in case they are sharing DSNs to connect to different databases. In addition, change the settings for the ‘Connection lifetime’ and the ‘Connection idle time out’.  Follow the steps below to perform the mentioned changes and verify the report after each step and some of the settings require i-server r...
    4 comments
    Read more

    Settings for Outer Join between metrics in MicroStrategy

    Settings for Outer Join between metrics in MicroStrategy MicroStrategy adopts multi-pass logic to determine the execution plan for a report. This means that every metric is evaluated in separate SQL passes. Outer Joins come into play when MicroStrategy Engine merges the results from all SQL passes into one report. For a multi-pass report, different Outer Join behaviors can give the user completely different results. In addition, report metrics can be of different types which can, in some cases, influence the result of the outer join. In MicroStrategy, there are two settings that users can access to control Outer Join behavior : Formula Join Type and Metric Join Type . Metric Join Type: VLDB Setting at Database Instance Level Report and Template Levels Report Editor > Data > Report Data Options Metric Level   Metric editor > Tools > Metric Join Type Control Join between Metrics Formula Join Type: Only at Compound/Split...
    1 comment
    Read more

    Create an alert-based subscription in MicroStrategy Distribution Services

    Create an alert-based subscription in MicroStrategy Distribution Services on Web Subscription to a report or Report Services document which will be executed when a certain conditional threshold is met based on another executing report. For example, a scheduled report executes which shows the Revenue by day for the past week. If the Revenue on any one day falls below a certain value, a subscription to another report or Report Services document can be triggered and delivered to a recipient. An alert based subscription can only be created directly on a report; however, another report or Report Services document can be delivered when the alert based subscription is triggered. Note: you need a grid report to create an alert and you cannot create if you want to create on a document with text boxes. The following example will walk through the basic steps on how to setup a subscription based on an alert like this: Follow the brief  steps bel...
    3 comments
    Read more

    Customers Who Live in the Same City as Call Centers

    Customers Who Live in the Same City as Call Centers Your new utility company has call centers located throughout the country, and your recent surveys indicate that customers who live in the same city as a call center are particularly satisfied with service due to extremely rapid repairs during power outages. To begin your new advertising campaign, you want to generate a list of Call Centers that coincide with Customer Cities. The following steps create an attribute-to-attribute qualification filter that generates the list of desired cities. To Create an Attribute-To-Attribute Qualification that Compares the Call Center and Customer City Attributes In MicroStrategy Web, log in to a project. Open any folder page (for example, click Shared Folders on the home page). Click the  Create Filter  icon  . From the Object browser on the left, select the  Customer City  attribute from the Customers hierarchy and drag it to the filter pane on the right. Change  Qualify...
    1 comment
    Read more

    MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway operation modes

    MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway operation modes MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway is a native connector which was built based on Spark 1.6.x. You can choose one or more data files from Hadoop HDFS and load them into MicroStrategy Intelligence Server. Data files can be published as either an In-Memory Cube or a Live Connect Cube. MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway supports three operation modes : YARN client Standalone (HDP cluster does not support Standalone) Local YARN client mode: The driver runs in the client process, and the application master is only used for requesting resources from YARN. Running in this mode requires YARN service to be enabled on your Hadoop cluster. Standalone mode:  MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway uses Spark Master to coordinate data processing. Local mode:  no application is deployed in the Spark nodes. All data processing is executed in the MicroStrategy Hadoop Gateway host. This modality is intended for testing and troubleshooting.
    2 comments
    Read more

    No 'Alert' option appear when trying to create an alert-based subscription in MicroStrategy Distribution Services

    The 'Alert' option does not appear when attempting to create an alert-based subscription in MicroStrategy Distribution Services In MicroStrategy Distribution Service 9.x and 10.x, and 11.x versions it is possible to create an alert-based subscription. When right-clicking the metric header of a report in MicroStrategy Web 9.0.x, the 'Alerts' option does not appear:    Cause : This issue occurs because the user attempting to create the alert does  not have all of the necessary privileges on alerts.   Fix : In order to create an alert-based subscription, the following privileges are required: In order ti get permissions to create alerts the user should be given the following privileges by the admin: New Version of Microstrategy 11.x: Server- Distribution: Older Versions of Microstrategy 9.x, 10.x etc..: Web Reporter > Web user Web Analyst > Web create alert   ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Custom Tooltips in Microstrategy developer and Web

    Custom Tooltips in Microstrategy developer and Web The following table describes the macros you can use to customize graph tooltips in both MicroStrategy Developer and MicroStrategy Web: Macro Information Displayed {&TOOLTIP} All relevant labels and values associated with a graph item. {&GROUPLABEL} Name of the graph item's category. This value is often the graph item's attribute element information, as attributes are commonly used as the categories of graph reports. {&SERIESLABEL} Name of the graph item’s series. This value is often the graph item's metric name information, as metrics are commonly used as the series of graph reports. {&VALUE} The value of a given data point. {&XVALUE} The X-value of a data point. Only applicable to Bubble charts and Scatter plots. {&YVALUE} The Y-value of a data point. Only applicable to Bubble charts and Scatter plots. {&ZVALUE} The Z-value of a data point. Only applicable to Bubble charts and Scatter plots. {...
    2 comments
    Read more

    Algorithm to calculate Logical Table Size in Microstrategy

    How are the fact tables determined using the logical table size for SQL generation in MicroStrategy The logical table size is an integer number that represents the granularity or level of aggregation of a particular table. It is called 'logical' because it is not related to the physical size of the tables (number of rows). It is calculated according to the attribute IDs that are present in the table and their level in the system hierarchy.   Even though, the number does not reveal the actual number of rows in the table, it is an accurate way of measuring a table size without having to access its contents.   IMPORTANT:   The system hierarchy is defined by the parent-child relationships between attributes of the same family (formerly known as a dimension), not by user-defined hierarchies (i.e., drilling hierarchies).   MicroStrategy Engine utilizes an algorithm based on attribute keys to calculate the Logical Table Size (LTS): Given the following tables: ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Microstrategy Removing sections that do not have metric data

    Removing sections that do not have metric data This is an interesting feature which might not be explored by many of us and it comes us handy. A  cross join between datasets can result in rows or Group Header/Footer sections that do not have metric data. For example, a document contains two datasets. Dataset 1 contains Year and Revenue, with data for three years (2007-2009). Dataset 2 contains Year and Profit, filtered to return data for only two years (2008 and 2009). If you place Year and Profit in the Details and execute the document, it displays three rows, although no profit data exists for 2007. This is a product of the cross join between the two datasets. You do not want to see the blank line for 2007 since it does not give you any data for profit. You can select the  Trim sections for which no metric value data is available  check box. This removes the row for 2007, since no metric data for Profit is available for 2007. The results are shown below: ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more