Skip to main content

Star schemas and aggregate (or summary) fact tables


Aggregate tables can further improve query performance by reducing the number of rows over which higher-level metrics must be aggregated. 
However, the use of aggregate tables with dimension tables is not a valid physical modeling strategy. Whenever aggregation is performed over fact data, it is a general requirement that tables joined to the fact table must be at the same attribute level or at a higher level. If the auxiliary table is at a lower level, fact rows will be replicated prior to aggregation and this will result in inflated metric values (also known as "multiple counting").

With the above Time dimension table, a fact table at the level of Day functions correctly because there is exactly one row in DIM_TIME for each day. To aggregate the facts to the level of Quarter, it is valid to join the fact table to the dimension table and group by the quarter ID from the dimension table.

Sql
select DT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(DT.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from DAY_FACT_TABLE FT
   join DIM_TIME DT
      on (FT.DAY_ID = DT.DAY_ID)
group by DT.QUARTER_ID

If, however, there is an aggregate fact table already at the level of Quarter, the results will not be correct. This is because the query must join on Quarter ID, but the quarter ID is not a unique key of the dimension table. Because any given quarter of a year contains 90, 91 or 92 days, the dimension table will contain that many rows with the same quarter ID. Thus fact rows will be replicated prior to taking the sum, and the sum will be too high.

Sql
select FT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(DT.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from QTR_FACT_TABLE FT
   join DIM_TIME DT
      on (FT.QUARTER_ID = DT.QUARTER_ID)
group by FT.QUARTER_ID

This is a generally recognized problem with star schemas, and is not strictly a MicroStrategy limitation.

Star schemas will function correctly with MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.x as long as they obey the general data warehousing principle that fact tables should not be at a higher level than the dimension tables to which they are joined.

If aggregate tables are required, it is necessary to provide higher-level lookup tables with unique rows corresponding to each aggregate table's key. Logical views are a way to do this without adding tables or views to the warehouse. For example, LWV_LU_QUARTER may be defined using the following SQL statement:

Sql
select distinct QUARTER_ID, QUARTER_DESC, YEAR_ID
from DIM_TIME

 

With this logical view, it becomes possible for MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.x to query the quarter-level fact table as follows. Since the logical view has distinct rows per quarter, multiple counting will not occur in this query.

Sql
select FT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(LQ.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from QTR_FACT_TABLE FT
   join (select distinct QUARTER_ID, QUARTER_DESC, YEAR_ID
         from DIM_TIME) LQ
      on (FT.QUARTER_ID = LQ.QUARTER_ID)
group by FT.QUARTER_ID

For more information on the use of logical views in MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.1.x and 9.x, consult the MicroStrategy Project Design Guide manual, Appendix B: Logical Tables, "Creating logical tables."

Aggregate tables store pre-summarized totals at a higher level of aggregation than the most granular fact table. They allow reports to be generated from small, rather than large, tables; therefore, performance is enhanced. A successful aggregation strategy seeks to choose aggregate tables that will have the most impact while taking the least amount of space.

Aggregation decisions are driven by the following factors:

  • Usage patterns: Build aggregate tables that are likely to be used the most.
  • Compression ratios: The compression ratio between two tables is defined as the size of the aggregate compared to the size of the smallest table from which the aggregate can be derived.
  • Volatility: Changes in hierarchies over time impact the accuracy of aggregate tables. Sometimes aggregate tables must be rebuilt as a result of changes in dimensions.
A good candidate for aggregation should have at most 10-15 percent of the size of the smallest table from which it is derived.

EXAMPLE:
The MicroStrategy Tutorial project uses aggregate tables by default. A simple metric sum (Revenue) will go to different aggregate tables depending on the attributes on the template.

  1. Create a report with Year on the rows and Revenue on the columns.
  2. Execute the report and view the SQL:

  3. Drill from Year to Item and view the SQL:

The query will go from using ORDER_FACT to ORDER_DETAIL. When Year is on the template, the engine selects the smaller table and the fact is calculated as:

sum(a11.ORDER_AMT)
    instead of:

    sum((a11.QTY_SOLD * (a11.UNIT_PRICE - a11.DISCOUNT)))
    Labels:

    Comments

    1. hinaFebruary 5, 2021 at 12:19 PM

      Is there any solution now to use aggregate tables with star schema without creating logical tables?

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    MicroStrategy URL API Parameters

    MicroStrategy URL Structure The following table summarizes the root URL structure used for every request to MicroStrategy Web. Environment Main Application URL Administration URL J2EE http://webserver/MicroStrategy/servlet/mstrWeb http://webserver/MicroStrategy/servlet/mstrWebAdmin .NET http://webserver/MicroStrategy/asp/Main.aspx http://webserver/MicroStrategy/asp/Admin.aspx Every request sent to MicroStrategy Web calls a central controller. Parameters are appended to  Main.aspx  or  mstrWeb  (in a .NET and J2EE environment, respectively) to indicate to the controller how the request should be internally forwarded and handled. The following examples show a URL for accessing a MicroStrategy folder when the user does not have an existing session. The URL contains not only the parameters needed to connect to MicroStrategy Web, but also the parameters needed to log on and create a session. J2EE environment: <a href="http:...
    2 comments
    Read more

    Multi-Table Data Import(MTDI) from one or more supported data sources

    Multi-Table Data Import(MTDI) from one or more supported data sources In MicroStrategy Analytics Enterprise Web 10 onewards, users can now simultaneously import two or more tables from one or more supported data sources, this feature is called Multi-Table Data Import (MTDI) which has been renamed as Super Cubes in MSTR 2019 (Does it sound like multisourcing for all the users without admin help?) Currently, all connectors in MicroStrategy Web 10 except " OLAP " and " Search Engine Indices " support Multi-Table Data Import. Users are able to add multiple tables/files when doing data import from single connector, as shown below: Users are also able to combine multiple tables/files from different sources and store them into one single Intelligent Cube, as shown below:
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Case functions Microstrategy

    Ca se functions Microstrategy Case functions return specified data in a SQL query based on the evaluation of user-defined conditions. In general, a user specifies a list of conditions and corresponding return values. Case This function evaluates multiple expressions until a condition is determined to be true, then returns a corresponding value. If all conditions are false, a default value is returned.  Case  can be used for categorizing data based on multiple conditions. This is a single-value function. Syntax Case ( Condition1 ,  ReturnValue1 ,  Condition2 , ReturnValue2 ,...,  DefaultValue ) Example Case(([Total Revenue] < 300000), 0, ([Total Revenue] < 600000), 1, 2) sum(Case (Day@DESC in (“Sat”,”Sun”), Sales, 0) {~+} Sum(Case(Category@DESC In("Books","Electronics"),Revenue,0)){~+} CaseV (case vector) CaseV  evaluates a single metric and returns different values according to the results. It can be used to perfo...
    3 comments
    Read more

    The logical table size calculation in Microstrategy

    The logical table size calculation in Microstrategy The logical table size is an integer number that represents the granularity or level of aggregation of a particular table. It is called 'logical' because it is not related to the physical size of the tables (number of rows). It is calculated according to the attribute IDs that are present in the table and their level in the system hierarchy.   Even though, the number does not reveal the actual number of rows in the table, it is an accurate way of measuring a table size without having to access its contents.   MicroStrategy Engine utilizes an algorithm based on attribute keys to calculate the Logical Table Size (LTS):   Given the following tables:     The algorithm that calculates the table sizes performs the following steps: Calculate the number of levels per hierarchy: Hierarchy 1: 3 Hierarchy 2: 4 Calculate each attribute individual weight according to the level in the hierarchy (level in hierarchy/number of ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Disable data blending in MicroStrategy

    Disable data blending in MicroStrategy Starting in MicroStrategy 9.4 data blending was made available for documents and dashboards. This permits grid, graph and widget objects to source data from multiple different datasets at the same time.  This is available under the analytical engine VLDB properties inside of project configuration. The property is named "document grids from multiple datasets" and defaults to enabled but can be set to disabled.  Below are the steps to enable/disable the settings of data blending: 1. Go to project configuration by right clicking on specific project(You need admin rights to do this). 2. In the Project configuration windows as shown below select Configure under Project level VLDB settings section. 3. Now it will open the VLDB settings window, select + on " Analytical Engine Settings " and then click on " Document Grids from multiple datasets " option. You will be presented with two...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    mstrio – Python and R wrappers for the MicroStrategy

    mstrio – Python and R wrappers for the MicroStrategy REST APIs Connecting to MicroStrategy  Create a connection to the Intelligence Server using   Connection()   and    connect()  in Python and R, respectively. Required arguments for the   Connection()  function are the URL for the MicroStrategy REST API server, MicroStrategy Intelligence Server username and password, as well as the MicroStrategy project name. By default, the   connect()  function anticipates your MicroStrategy Intelligence Server username and password. LDAP authentication is also supported. Use the optional argument    login_mode=16    in the    connect()  function for LDAP authentication.  Extract data from cubes and reports  To extract data from MicroStrategy cubes and reports, use the   get_cube()  and   get_report()  functions. Use...
    8 comments
    Read more

    Microstrategy Dossiers explained

    Microstrategy  Dossiers With the release of MicroStrategy 10.9, we’ve taken a leap forward in our dashboarding capabilities by simplifying the user experience, adding storytelling, and collaboration.MSTR has  evolved dashboards to the point that they are more than dashboards - they are  interactive, collaborative analytic stories . Ultimately, it was time to go beyond dashboards, both in concept and in name, and so  the've  renamed VI dashboards to  ‘ dossiers ’.  Dossiers can be created by using the new Desktop product or Workstation or simply from the Web interface which replaces Visual Insights. All the existing visual Insights dashboards will be converted to Dossiers   With MicroStrategy 10.9, there was an active focus on making it easier to build dashboards for the widest audience of end users. To achieve this, some key new capabilities were added that make it easier to author, read, interact and collaborate on dashboards ...
    7 comments
    Read more

    Components of the MicroStrategy Engine

    Components of the MicroStrategy Engine The MicroStrategy Engine consists of three engines:  • SQL Engine  • Query Engine  • Analytical Engine  These individual engines work together to fulfill report requests submitted by MicroStrategy that can be resolved by pure SQL alone.  The SQL Engine is responsible for generating optimized SQL and producing result sets that can be resolved by pure SQL alone. The Query Engine is responsible for executing the SQL generated by the SQL Engine.  The Analytical Engine is responsible for performing any calculation that cannot be resolved with SQL alone.
    1 comment
    Read more

    Types of result caches in Microstrategy

    Types of result caches Microstrategy The following types of  result caches are created by Intelligence Server: • Matching caches • History caches • Matching-History caches • XML caches All document caches are Matching caches; documents do not generate History caches or XML caches. Intelligent Cube reports do not create Matching caches. Matching caches Matching caches  are the  results of reports and documents that are retained for later use by the same requests later on. In general, Matching caches are the type of result caches that are used most often by Intelligence Server. When result caching is enabled, Intelligence Server determines for each request whether it can be served by an already existing Matching cache. If there is no match, it then runs the report or document on the database and creates a new Matching cache that can be reused if the same request is submitted again. This caching process is managed by the system administrator and ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more