Skip to main content

Star schemas and aggregate (or summary) fact tables


Aggregate tables can further improve query performance by reducing the number of rows over which higher-level metrics must be aggregated. 
However, the use of aggregate tables with dimension tables is not a valid physical modeling strategy. Whenever aggregation is performed over fact data, it is a general requirement that tables joined to the fact table must be at the same attribute level or at a higher level. If the auxiliary table is at a lower level, fact rows will be replicated prior to aggregation and this will result in inflated metric values (also known as "multiple counting").

With the above Time dimension table, a fact table at the level of Day functions correctly because there is exactly one row in DIM_TIME for each day. To aggregate the facts to the level of Quarter, it is valid to join the fact table to the dimension table and group by the quarter ID from the dimension table.

Sql
select DT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(DT.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from DAY_FACT_TABLE FT
   join DIM_TIME DT
      on (FT.DAY_ID = DT.DAY_ID)
group by DT.QUARTER_ID

If, however, there is an aggregate fact table already at the level of Quarter, the results will not be correct. This is because the query must join on Quarter ID, but the quarter ID is not a unique key of the dimension table. Because any given quarter of a year contains 90, 91 or 92 days, the dimension table will contain that many rows with the same quarter ID. Thus fact rows will be replicated prior to taking the sum, and the sum will be too high.

Sql
select FT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(DT.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from QTR_FACT_TABLE FT
   join DIM_TIME DT
      on (FT.QUARTER_ID = DT.QUARTER_ID)
group by FT.QUARTER_ID

This is a generally recognized problem with star schemas, and is not strictly a MicroStrategy limitation.

Star schemas will function correctly with MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.x as long as they obey the general data warehousing principle that fact tables should not be at a higher level than the dimension tables to which they are joined.

If aggregate tables are required, it is necessary to provide higher-level lookup tables with unique rows corresponding to each aggregate table's key. Logical views are a way to do this without adding tables or views to the warehouse. For example, LWV_LU_QUARTER may be defined using the following SQL statement:

Sql
select distinct QUARTER_ID, QUARTER_DESC, YEAR_ID
from DIM_TIME

 

With this logical view, it becomes possible for MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.x to query the quarter-level fact table as follows. Since the logical view has distinct rows per quarter, multiple counting will not occur in this query.

Sql
select FT.QUARTER_ID,
   max(LQ.QUARTER_DESC) Quarter_Desc
   sum(FT.REVENUE) Revenue
from QTR_FACT_TABLE FT
   join (select distinct QUARTER_ID, QUARTER_DESC, YEAR_ID
         from DIM_TIME) LQ
      on (FT.QUARTER_ID = LQ.QUARTER_ID)
group by FT.QUARTER_ID

For more information on the use of logical views in MicroStrategy SQL Generation Engine 8.1.x and 9.x, consult the MicroStrategy Project Design Guide manual, Appendix B: Logical Tables, "Creating logical tables."

Aggregate tables store pre-summarized totals at a higher level of aggregation than the most granular fact table. They allow reports to be generated from small, rather than large, tables; therefore, performance is enhanced. A successful aggregation strategy seeks to choose aggregate tables that will have the most impact while taking the least amount of space.

Aggregation decisions are driven by the following factors:

  • Usage patterns: Build aggregate tables that are likely to be used the most.
  • Compression ratios: The compression ratio between two tables is defined as the size of the aggregate compared to the size of the smallest table from which the aggregate can be derived.
  • Volatility: Changes in hierarchies over time impact the accuracy of aggregate tables. Sometimes aggregate tables must be rebuilt as a result of changes in dimensions.
A good candidate for aggregation should have at most 10-15 percent of the size of the smallest table from which it is derived.

EXAMPLE:
The MicroStrategy Tutorial project uses aggregate tables by default. A simple metric sum (Revenue) will go to different aggregate tables depending on the attributes on the template.

  1. Create a report with Year on the rows and Revenue on the columns.
  2. Execute the report and view the SQL:

  3. Drill from Year to Item and view the SQL:

The query will go from using ORDER_FACT to ORDER_DETAIL. When Year is on the template, the engine selects the smaller table and the fact is calculated as:

sum(a11.ORDER_AMT)
    instead of:

    sum((a11.QTY_SOLD * (a11.UNIT_PRICE - a11.DISCOUNT)))

    Comments

    1. Is there any solution now to use aggregate tables with star schema without creating logical tables?

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    HyperIntelligence Training Videos

    HyperIntelligence  Training Videos           Design and build hyper cards Optimizing Datasets for HyperIntelligence Using the HyperIntelligence for Office Outlook Add-In Building HyperIntelligence Cards Using HyperIntelligence for Mobile on Android Deploying HyperIntelligence for Outlook Insights On-The-Go: HyperIntelligence for Mobile Building HyperIntelligence Profile Cards Designing Custom HyperIntelligence Cards Using the Calendar with HyperIntelligence for Mobile

    Microstrategy Dossiers explained

    Microstrategy  Dossiers With the release of MicroStrategy 10.9, we’ve taken a leap forward in our dashboarding capabilities by simplifying the user experience, adding storytelling, and collaboration.MSTR has  evolved dashboards to the point that they are more than dashboards - they are  interactive, collaborative analytic stories . Ultimately, it was time to go beyond dashboards, both in concept and in name, and so  the've  renamed VI dashboards to  ‘ dossiers ’.  Dossiers can be created by using the new Desktop product or Workstation or simply from the Web interface which replaces Visual Insights. All the existing visual Insights dashboards will be converted to Dossiers   With MicroStrategy 10.9, there was an active focus on making it easier to build dashboards for the widest audience of end users. To achieve this, some key new capabilities were added that make it easier to author, read, interact and collaborate on dashboards ...

    Microstrategy Document Autotext macros:

    Autotext  code/macros in  Microstrategy Document/dashboard This is a list of the available auto text macros that the Report Services Document engine recognizes. The following auto text codes allow you to add  document variable information to your document. These auto text codes are automatically replaced by information about the document. Auto text codes for MSTR document/dashboard:  AUTOTEXT DESCRIPTION   {&PAGE}  Display the current page.  {&NPAGES}  Display the total number of pages.  {&DATETIME}  Display the current date and time.  {&USER}  Display the user name that is executing the Report Services Document.  {&DOCUMENT}  Display the document name.  {&DOCUMENTID}  Display the document ID.  {&DESCRIPTION}  Display the document description.  {&PROJECT}  Display the project name.  {&EXECUTIONTIME}  Dis...

    Administration standards to optimize network data transfer speeds

    Optimization standards to help developers work with the System Administrator to optimize network data transfer speeds: Place all server components in the same segment to minimize latency between the Intelligence Server, Web server, data warehouse server, and metadata server Expand bandwidth and minimize latency between servers and clients to ensure that bottlenecks do not occur when data is requested over your network Use HTTP compression between the Web servers and Web clients to achieve maximum throughput between these components Configure a Web proxy server to handle caching and reduce the load on the Web server

    MicroStrategy URL API Parameters

    MicroStrategy URL Structure The following table summarizes the root URL structure used for every request to MicroStrategy Web. Environment Main Application URL Administration URL J2EE http://webserver/MicroStrategy/servlet/mstrWeb http://webserver/MicroStrategy/servlet/mstrWebAdmin .NET http://webserver/MicroStrategy/asp/Main.aspx http://webserver/MicroStrategy/asp/Admin.aspx Every request sent to MicroStrategy Web calls a central controller. Parameters are appended to  Main.aspx  or  mstrWeb  (in a .NET and J2EE environment, respectively) to indicate to the controller how the request should be internally forwarded and handled. The following examples show a URL for accessing a MicroStrategy folder when the user does not have an existing session. The URL contains not only the parameters needed to connect to MicroStrategy Web, but also the parameters needed to log on and create a session. J2EE environment: <a href="http:...

    Customers Who Live in the Same City as Call Centers

    Customers Who Live in the Same City as Call Centers Your new utility company has call centers located throughout the country, and your recent surveys indicate that customers who live in the same city as a call center are particularly satisfied with service due to extremely rapid repairs during power outages. To begin your new advertising campaign, you want to generate a list of Call Centers that coincide with Customer Cities. The following steps create an attribute-to-attribute qualification filter that generates the list of desired cities. To Create an Attribute-To-Attribute Qualification that Compares the Call Center and Customer City Attributes In MicroStrategy Web, log in to a project. Open any folder page (for example, click Shared Folders on the home page). Click the  Create Filter  icon  . From the Object browser on the left, select the  Customer City  attribute from the Customers hierarchy and drag it to the filter pane on the right. Change  Qualify...

    mstrio – Python and R wrappers for the MicroStrategy

    mstrio – Python and R wrappers for the MicroStrategy REST APIs Connecting to MicroStrategy  Create a connection to the Intelligence Server using   Connection()   and    connect()  in Python and R, respectively. Required arguments for the   Connection()  function are the URL for the MicroStrategy REST API server, MicroStrategy Intelligence Server username and password, as well as the MicroStrategy project name. By default, the   connect()  function anticipates your MicroStrategy Intelligence Server username and password. LDAP authentication is also supported. Use the optional argument    login_mode=16    in the    connect()  function for LDAP authentication.  Extract data from cubes and reports  To extract data from MicroStrategy cubes and reports, use the   get_cube()  and   get_report()  functions. Use...

    Fact tables levels tables in Microstrategy explained

    Fact tables levels in Microstrategy: Fact tables are used to store fact data. Fact tables should contain attribute Id's and fact values which are measurable. All the descriptive information about the fact tables should stored in Dimension tables either in Star Schema fashion or Snow Flake Schema fashion which is best suited to your reporting solution. Since attributes provide context for fact values, both fact columns and attribute ID columns are included in fact tables. Facts help to link indirectly related attributes using these attribute ID columns. The attribute ID columns included in a fact table represent the level at which the facts in that table are stored. So the level of a fact table in the Fact_Item_Day_Customer can be the attribute Id's which is at Day, Item & Customer Id level. For example, fact tables containing sales and inventory data look like the tables shown in the following diagram: Base fact columns ver...

    Microstrategy "Error type: Odbc error. Odbc operation attempted

     "Error type: Odbc error. Odbc operation attempted: SQLExecDirect. [HYT00:0: on SQLHANDLE] [MicroStrategy][ODBC Oracle Wire Protocol driver]Timeout expired" is shown when executing reports from Web When users are trying to execute some reports in MicroStrategy web in particular, they may receive the Error “SQL Generation Complete Index out of range” and “Timeout expired” error as shown below: Possible Causes: One possible cause is that the MicroStrategy Intelligence Server using a cached database connection that was already dropped by the RDBMS. To resolve this: Admin should delete the database connection caches and create a new DSNs in case they are sharing DSNs to connect to different databases. In addition, change the settings for the ‘Connection lifetime’ and the ‘Connection idle time out’.  Follow the steps below to perform the mentioned changes and verify the report after each step and some of the settings require i-server r...