Skip to main content

Applycomparison advancd filter with a select statement

ApplyComparison ("#0 >= (select max(Hour)-1 from FACTTABLE where DAYDATE = current_date)", Hour@ID)
MicroStrategy’s strongest feature is it’s SQL Engine. The ability to define object relationships and then allow MicroStrategy to generate all of the appropriate SQL as you manipulate and drill is the core of the product. But of course, it can’t handle every since situation and you may sometimes need to help it along in certain instances. To extend this flexibility to you, MicroStrategy offers 5 functions which allow you to directly supply the SQL you want for a specific piece of the Query: ApplySimpleApplyAggApplyComparisonApplyOLAP and ApplyLogical. Today, I’ll talk about ApplyComparison, which allows you to provide custom SQL in the WHERE clause of the query.
Example Scenario

Say that you have a report that should compare Units Sold for Today vs Yesterday by Hour. If you were to build this report by simply adding the Hour attribute and two Conditional Metrics for Today Units Sold and Yesterday Units Sold, you’d end up with a graph like this:
external image tvy1.gifFictitious Data
It’s a nice picture of how the days are comparing, but it’s a little ugly since we don’t have data for 7am and ahead for today yet. Ideally, we’d like to filter off the data for Today that we haven’t received, but how do we know where we are? Assuming that we aren’t strictly real time and can’t assume based on the current time, we’d want to check the max Hour that exists in the table, and then go up to that minus 1. We could probably build that with some different types of metrics or a Report as Filter, but I’ll choose to do this using an ApplyComparison.
Before you start

First of all, you can only build this kind of filter in Desktop (so, not Web). You also need to enable the feature in Desktop, as it’s not available be default. Go to Tools->My Preferences->Filters and check the box for Show Advanced Qualifications. This will enable the option to use ApplyComparison’s in Filters.
Back to the Report

Double click on your Report Filter and you’ll now have the option to add an Advanced Qualification:
external image tvy4.gif
You can then provide the code for the ApplyComparison. The code you provide will go into the WHERE clause, and you can pass attribute values using the #n syntax, where n is the zero based number of parameters you’re passing. In my example, I’m passing a single parameter, so it’s #0. I could pass additional values by also including #1, #2, etc in my code if I needed them. Also note that when you provide the value at the end of the statement, it’s in the format Hour@ID, not just Hour. MicroStrategy changes the display of it slightly in my screenshot to Hour (ID), but the actual code you’ll be using looks like this:
ApplyComparison ("#0 >= (select max(Hour)-1 from FACTTABLE where DAYDATE = current_date)", Hour@ID)
external image tvy3.gif
And now the graph looks nice and clean:

external image tvy2-300x170.pngFictitious Data
BONUS TIP

Another way to accomplish this using ApplySimple instead of ApplyComparison would be to drag the Hour attribute to the Report Filter like normal, choose ID as the form and Greater Than or Equal To as the operator, and choose Custom from the drop down box and provide the ApplySimple code:
external image tvy5.gif
ApplySimple("(select max(Hour)-1 from FACTTABLE where DAYDATE = current_date)", 0)

Since we’re not including any parameters for this query, we can use 0 as the placeholder at the end to satisfy the function’s parameters.
This will generate the same SQL and results, but without needing to enable the Advanced Qualification option which could be confusing to some.

ApplyComparison("#0<=(select to_number(to_char(add_months(sysdate(),-1), 'yyyymm'))) ",[Instance Month]@ID)

Worked example:
select distinct a11.month_sid
from mstr_datamart.date_dim a11
where a11.date_sid<=(select to_number(to_char(add_months(sysdate(),-1), 'yyyymmDD'))) and a11.date_sid>=(select min(utc_date_sid) from mstr_datamart.ox_transaction_sum_daily_fact)
order by 1 desc

ApplyComparison("#0<=(select to_number(to_char(add_months(sysdate(),-1), 'yyyymmDD'))) and #0>=(select min(utc_date_sid) from mstr_datamart.ox_transaction_sum_daily_fact order by 1 desc)",[UTC Date]@ID)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MicroStrategy URL API Parameters

MicroStrategy URL Structure The following table summarizes the root URL structure used for every request to MicroStrategy Web. Environment Main Application URL Administration URL J2EE http://webserver/MicroStrategy/servlet/mstrWeb http://webserver/MicroStrategy/servlet/mstrWebAdmin .NET http://webserver/MicroStrategy/asp/Main.aspx http://webserver/MicroStrategy/asp/Admin.aspx Every request sent to MicroStrategy Web calls a central controller. Parameters are appended to  Main.aspx  or  mstrWeb  (in a .NET and J2EE environment, respectively) to indicate to the controller how the request should be internally forwarded and handled. The following examples show a URL for accessing a MicroStrategy folder when the user does not have an existing session. The URL contains not only the parameters needed to connect to MicroStrategy Web, but also the parameters needed to log on and create a session. J2EE environment: <a href="http:...

Case functions Microstrategy

Ca se functions Microstrategy Case functions return specified data in a SQL query based on the evaluation of user-defined conditions. In general, a user specifies a list of conditions and corresponding return values. Case This function evaluates multiple expressions until a condition is determined to be true, then returns a corresponding value. If all conditions are false, a default value is returned.  Case  can be used for categorizing data based on multiple conditions. This is a single-value function. Syntax Case ( Condition1 ,  ReturnValue1 ,  Condition2 , ReturnValue2 ,...,  DefaultValue ) Example Case(([Total Revenue] < 300000), 0, ([Total Revenue] < 600000), 1, 2) sum(Case (Day@DESC in (“Sat”,”Sun”), Sales, 0) {~+} Sum(Case(Category@DESC In("Books","Electronics"),Revenue,0)){~+} CaseV (case vector) CaseV  evaluates a single metric and returns different values according to the results. It can be used to perfo...

Execute Integrity manager test from Command line

Execute Integrity manager test from Command line  MSTR Integrity Manager allows the user to execute a test without having to load the GUI, or to schedule a test to run later at specific times or dates. Go over using Windows AT command at: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/313565/how-to-use-the-at-command-to-schedule-tasks https://www.lifewire.com/at-command-2618090 Here are the prerequisites to execute a test from the command line: Create a test and saved using the Integrity Manager graphical interface. Make sure that the users has the ' Use Integrity Manager ' privilege for that project(provided by the administrator) and the ' Execute ' permission for the reports to be tested. Keep in mind that MicroStrategy Integrity Manager can only test three-tier projects, i.e., projects which are connected to a MicroStrategy i- Server. Projects in Direct Connection (two-tier) mode cannot be tested with this tool...

The logical table size calculation in Microstrategy

The logical table size calculation in Microstrategy The logical table size is an integer number that represents the granularity or level of aggregation of a particular table. It is called 'logical' because it is not related to the physical size of the tables (number of rows). It is calculated according to the attribute IDs that are present in the table and their level in the system hierarchy.   Even though, the number does not reveal the actual number of rows in the table, it is an accurate way of measuring a table size without having to access its contents.   MicroStrategy Engine utilizes an algorithm based on attribute keys to calculate the Logical Table Size (LTS):   Given the following tables:     The algorithm that calculates the table sizes performs the following steps: Calculate the number of levels per hierarchy: Hierarchy 1: 3 Hierarchy 2: 4 Calculate each attribute individual weight according to the level in the hierarchy (level in hierarchy/number of ...

Microstrategy Dossiers explained

Microstrategy  Dossiers With the release of MicroStrategy 10.9, we’ve taken a leap forward in our dashboarding capabilities by simplifying the user experience, adding storytelling, and collaboration.MSTR has  evolved dashboards to the point that they are more than dashboards - they are  interactive, collaborative analytic stories . Ultimately, it was time to go beyond dashboards, both in concept and in name, and so  the've  renamed VI dashboards to  ‘ dossiers ’.  Dossiers can be created by using the new Desktop product or Workstation or simply from the Web interface which replaces Visual Insights. All the existing visual Insights dashboards will be converted to Dossiers   With MicroStrategy 10.9, there was an active focus on making it easier to build dashboards for the widest audience of end users. To achieve this, some key new capabilities were added that make it easier to author, read, interact and collaborate on dashboards ...

Prompt-in-prompt(Nested Prompts) in Microstrategy

Prompt-in-prompt(Nested Prompts) in  Microstrategy Nested prompts allows you to create one prompt based on the other and other bases on another, nested prompts allows us to prompt the highest level(Like year) to middle level(like Quarter, then to the low level(like Month). Here you can see how to  create a 3-level deep nested prompt that will prompt the user to select a year, then a quarter within that year, then a month within that quarter. Prompt-in-prompt is a feature in which the answer to one prompt is used to define another prompt. This feature is only implemented for element list prompts . The following procedure describes how to achieve this: Create the highest level filter. This is a filter which contains a prompt on an attribute element list. Create a filter on the attribute "Year." Click "prompt on attribute element list" and click "Next" through the rest of the screens to accept the default values. Do not set any additio...

Microstrategy Custom group and consolidation comparison

Custom group and consolidation comparison Both consolidations and custom groups provide flexibility in reports, but the objects differ in their structure and use. The essential distinction is that consolidations work with attributes and custom groups use filters. Consolidations are groupings of attribute elements while custom groups are based on filter criteria. Custom groups are used to apply different filters to different rows of a report. Consolidations are used to create virtual attributes to allow reporting on attributes that do not exist in the data model. Finally, row level math can be performed with consolidations but not with custom groups. Custom groups are more flexible than consolidations because you do not have to know much about your data to create filters for a custom group. In contrast, consolidations require that you know exactly which attribute elements to select when creating the consolidation. To continue with the examples from the previous sect...

Control the display of null and zero metric values

Show   Control the display of null and zero metric values in a grid report You can determine how to display or hide rows and columns in a grid report that consist only of null or zero metric values. You can have MicroStrategy hide the rows and columns in the following ways: Hide rows and columns that consist only of null metric values Hide rows and columns that consist only of zero metric values Hide rows and columns that consist only of null or zero metric values (default) Once you have defined how MicroStrategy hides null and zero metric values in the grid, you can quickly show or hide the grid using the Hide Nulls/Zeros option in the Data menu, as described below, or by clicking the  Hide Nulls/Zeros  icon  in the Data toolbar. To determine how null and zero metric values are displayed or hidden in a grid report Open the report in Edit mode. From the  Tools  menu, select  Report Options . The Report Options...

Microstrategy document/dashboard applying selections as filters or slices

Applying selections as filters or slices In a Microstrategy Document the selections a user makes in a selector can either filter or slice the data in the target: Filtering means that the data for the current selection is calculated only when it is requested by the user. The selections are used to filter the underlying dataset before the metric values are aggregated at the level of the Grid/Graph that is displayed in the document. If the source attribute is not included in the Grid/Graph, the metric values from all the selected elements are aggregated and shown at the level specified in the Grid/Graph. All metric condition selectors (which filter metric values or ranks) and selectors that target other selectors filter data by default. You cannot change them to slicing selectors. Slicing means that the data for each available item in the selector is calculated in advance when the document is first displayed. Selections made while ...